Summary criticizes of the text Criticizes the evaluation (Peter Demon) the critical text the evaluation, as a whole, where the appraiser (the professor), does not like to be evaluated. in its condition of appraiser already does not evaluate the pupil and on the other hand it is not evaluated. The MEC provides to avaliativas proposals for the professors, more the same ones does not appear, with distrust to be evaluated, is indguinado with such proposal, therefore for they are the same that to say that they evaluate its pupils badly and to recognize that she failed and complicated for some professors. The author also analyzes the evaluation technique of the SAEB for evaluating all the pupils with the same questionnaire in them varies series, becoming difficult for the pupils of 1 series to answer all the questions, although the avaliativas imperfections the SAEB has more merit that progoes. Therefore the author affirms that in the educational point of view if it cannot evaluate the human beings in way joust therefore for cannot establish unitary deep cloth standards of normative and that all evaluation she is incomplete. Which is the professor, especially, what year acts in group until 5 (4 series) and that, therefore keeps daily contact with its pupils, who do not observe them daily that he does not learn to see when they present some problem, that he does not know how much each one is progressing. He will be that this professor, really, if imprisons to the data of a test? We cannot abolish definitive moments where the tasks individuas are necessary as support to the diagnosis of the progress of each one, we know, however, that we cannot in them limit they, therefore the learning occurs in dynamic way, continues. Carson Wen is full of insight into the issues. Evaluation alone is coherent if to fulfill its paper in this process, has that to be a constant, systematic and not only moment..