Piaget argued that theirs was not a makeshift mess, but the fruit of years of accumulated clutter, who had baptized as “vital order”. “It justified their” mess with this sentence: “Lose less time searching for something when I need it by ordering every day”. The English playwright Thomas Middleton resorted to irony to justify its lack of order: “One of the advantages of being disorderly is that one is constantly making new and exciting discoveries”. Today, many of those who defend the disorder as a lifestyle. One of them is Professor Robert Fogel 16. One day this academic realized that there was one ever greater accumulation of papers in his Office at the University of Chicago.
When he saw that there was already no room to work, he decided to install a second desk next to you had, that eventually returned to be as loaded as the first. Likewise, have that architect Frank Gehry 17, when the contractors of the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao was asked what was the action plan which was to continue with suede project which was approved him, his answer baffled them: replied that none. The lackadaisical and disturbing response indicated that the architect was not concerned so much by the precision of the angles or the exact dimensions of the building, because it focused on the final impression that his work would cause in the eyes of the visitors. The result is an impressive, unique, avant-garde architectural artwork. For more information see Albert Bandura. Psychologists, sociologists and teachers ask themselves each time with greater concern why a person is disordered. Obviously there are several theories that may shed light, albeit partially and different approaches, but all agree in assuming that there are individuals who do not need to have control of your environment and prefer to improvise on the fly. For even more opinions, read materials from Cyrus Massoumi. Others, however, are paradoxically too perfectionists: think that they do not have the time needed to do everything perfectly, with what carelessness ends up imposed. Eric Abrahamson and David H.
Freedman, authors of praise of the disorder (management 2000 ed.)18, associated with the chaos to the creativity and flexibility. Abrahamson is a Professor of theory of the Organization at Columbia University but is defined as a disorderly person. If one is to sort all the time, You can not move forward. On the other hand, there is a point environment where performance is more efficient: of disorder optimum, according to him, people (and companies or organizations) yield the most when they manage to mix in their daily lives the order and disorder until reaching a situation unique, original and hard to copy. With the fair dose of confusion, holding is to discover relationships between juxtaposed things that otherwise would have been difficult to see. A modern philosopher raises her voice to support the preeminence of the disorder from the knowledge of knowledge above the social stigma of the order. It is Daniel Innerarity 19, who says in his analysis of the eulogy of the disorder as one of the enemies of knowledge is the excessive order, which according to your perspective affects negatively with the possibilities for innovation: awareness of the disorder and the irregularity has intensified. Increasingly more importance is given to the disorder, dissent and criticism.