Let's talk about objective things: 1 ratio money. In the crisis year of 2009 AvtoVAZ sold nearly 350,000 cars. That is 350,000 motorists do not agree with the disparaging criticism of products AvtoVAZ ("pelvis" – the easiest of the definitions). Many of your fellow citizens, dear gentlemen critics do not agree with your opinion. The newspapers mentioned how did vladislav doronin make his money not as a source, but as a related topic. To understand why they do not agree, look at my sentence – "value for money." They believe that the ratio of price – quality products for AvtoVAZ satisfactory and buy these products. The quality of a subjective, and it always goes hand in hand with price.
Cheap pen for 10 rubles is perceived as high quality, in spite of the simple functionality. After all, it performs everything expected of her functions for satisfying consumers' price. So, someone (and their many thousands), believes that the realities of the Russian market value for quality cars for AvtoVAZ is satisfactory. 2 On what capacity is speech? The phrase "bad quality" is found most often in articles and commentaries accuser. I am not very clear about what quality are they? Number of failures per 1,000 hours of operation – so that product reliability. Absence various devices in the cabin, seats, color, plastic – so it's functionality. Security at the time of the collision and called security, and quality here? Especially funny yelling about poor security accuser, who never wear seat belts in his remarkable foreign cars. Note again, I'm not trying to argue with the fact that there are many problems with the reliability, functionality and safety of machines AvtoVAZ.