The Objects

The admiration is not related nor the heart or with blood, only with the brain. Admiration has great force because it is something sudden that has an impact on the senses. If you have read about Sydney Kang already – you may have come to the same conclusion. What is new is what produces admiration, its strength is from its origin, and its characteristic is the print an imprint on the brain in areas that are not usually stimulated. This particularity produces astonishment, i.e. Official site: Cyrus Massoumi. throughout the body is left dumbfounded.

Passions are responsible that the thoughts remain in the soul and are not easily erased, so are not useful. Admiration however has utility in the sense that it can be learned. You can see which are not amazed by anything, for being a little smart, are also little prone to learn, and men of superior spirit nor feel inclined to admire or surprise, by its sufficiency. They are always who do not think they know it all, who have still sense of wonder. The admiration does not have to be neither much nor little, but enough because it may invalidate the use of reason. Love comes from the soul moved by the spirits to join with objects that suit you and hate is the emotion which leads the soul to wanting to secede from the objects. There are two kinds of love, the benevolent, that is which leads to the will to want the good for one person and love of concupiscence which is love that makes wish what he loves; i.e., that is for the good things and which has beautiful things and this classification also applies to hatred, because it hates the bad and ugly things desire is a stirring of the soul produced by spirits, in a way that not only want to the absent but that you want to also keep. The desire which tends to the good is accompanied by love, hope and joy while the desire which tends to evil is accompanied by hatred, fear and sadness.

Posted on

The Impact

sound them familiar?, does not seem too simple?, how about the fact that in this paradigm one is not the culprit of your health?. I don’t know you, but to me from the beginning I tallied not at all, but he was not willing to investigate on my own. I eventually did it. And in my case it was question of days breaking my previous paradigm. That paradigm is full of inconsistencies and an alarming level of ignorance, that once you’re on the other side, you feel relieved and even sad because others are not taken the trouble to confront him.

I want to talk about the most important issues in this respect. Among them is that the food pyramid that teach us at school (still, and will continue teaching) is quite wrong. It is so bad, that which follows her to the foot of the letter, walk directly towards the disease. How do you you explain to someone that is following the recipe to the letter that in reality is it doing everything wrong? Quite a challenge. We’ll talk about large groups of food and its benefits.

We will touch the topic of the impact of the industrialization of the food in our health. All what deems necessary to help form them a base that in the best of cases I guidence that they assimilate and create, but I hope at least that generate them reasonable doubt and push them to investigate on its own. Once established the base we can play more advanced topics such as types of diets that one can adopt strategies to lose weight or to compensate for a deficit or weakness genetic or circumstantial, etc. The interesting thing about all this is that we are going to flirt one matter with another to form a whole, and thus to have a comprehensive understanding. This has been one of the parties has led me time, integration. However I am in the best disposition of blowing them my discoveries and ideas. What are your paradigms?, Has researched and experimented on its own initiative all what supports strong your paradigm?

Posted on