He is valid, however, to leave clearly, that it is not treated here to make critical to some didactic procedure, as is the case of expositivas lessons, resource frequently used still in the current days, and that when made of adjusted form, becomes an efficient resource. To read more click here: Gerald Weissmann, MD. The education model that to our way to think, does not pass of mere pretension, is that one that already was denounced for Scrates (470-399 B.C.). In the book ' ' The Repblica' ' , Plato registered severe critical the done ones for Scrates to the Sofistas, for oratria searched carefully its, that for times, contained only half truths. In this process, the interlocutors only received passively the message without the chance to question. You may find bfpl to be a useful source of information. Therefore, it is necessary to think that nor everything that if says in way pretty and of elegant form it must be considered as truth. What if it perceives in the education offered for the sofistas, is that did not have opening for the dialogue. So that it has freedom for education is necessary to prevent that education that it aims at to catequizar, to dogmatizar the people, or, also an elitist and authoritarian education, that it looks to silence the other. For Freire (1996), as much one how much to the other they are harmful and alienator, and steals a right vital of that they search and they wait of the school the space to develop and to exert its freedom.
Being thus, it does not have, therefore, possibility of intervention and transformation in the world, therefore the freedom for the dialogue is necessary. It is in the school that if comes across with the plurality of ideas, different conceptions of world, and the most diverse cultures. From there the legitimate necessity of the dialogue, in reason of the men to have the necessity of if sociabilizar, learning to live together, to learn to live with the others (DELORS, 2001, P. .
Thus, a new education is established, as that one of the good orator. Thus, the sofistas taught techniques of persuasion for the young, to a raised price, in way that, in the assemblies, was capable to have strong arguments to gain the quarrel. The sofistas defended the idea of that, in such a way, good citizens would form themselves, and that the teachings of the sofistas did not have utility for the life in the plis, beyond being repletos of errors and contradictions. Thus, the Sofistas, whose word means ‘ ‘ sbio’ ‘ , they were presented as masters of oratria or of rhetoric. But, later, in accordance with Hamlyn (1990), to its contemporaries, them passes if to be known as dodgers. ‘ ‘ Scrates censured them because it found that they alleged to supply more than what they really gave. In special, it alleged that they said that they could teach virtue to the man and found that they did not make nothing of this ‘ ‘. (HAMLYN, 1990, p.25) CONCLUSION the philosophy appears as a new way to think on the world, going against the mythical thought.
This was influenced significantly by the sprouting of the Plis. The first thinkers, the Jnicos, searched a unit basic of the nature, whereas the sofistas dedicated the relations to it between the men and the society. The argument was basic for the life politics in the Plis, where the art of the persuasion was taught for the sofistas.
During century IX and XX the economic and social development of our country brought obtains social damages, therefore in a context of economic, industrial and urban growth they are inserted the aggravation of the social crises: proliferation of tenement houses, marginality, misery and crime, without isentar the minors who each time more early were directed to search, to fight for the sustenance and to promote its survival. Thus, they created new social rules that would guarantee ' to them; ' felicidade' ' leaving to usufruct of the educational, intellectual and social development. These minors influenced for the social environment where they lived were placed to the edge of the society by means of repression. All those that not if they inserted in the process of rules and productivity of the society was condemned the vagrancy and predestinold the repression. Such attitudes, of a child or adolescent, are recognized as revolt or social indifference. The desires of this individual in direction its happiness are fixed in distress and frustrations lived deeply in its I circulate social. These desires in search of its happiness find pleasure in the infraction of rules, the violence or the use of narcotics that ' ' suspendero' ' its you distress.
Before interacting with its pairs, the child is influenced by its parents. Since the birth she is submitted the multiple rules to discipline and same before speaking she takes conscience of that she possesss certain obligations. The social rules that the child learns do not correspond to its necessities and interests. For this reason, Piaget believes that it would be artificial to study the moral development from the comment of as the child understands and obeys such rules (Cria-Sabini, 1986). However, one admits that the moral is passvel of being conquered by the education. Each individual passes for a series of pressures on the part of the adults which determine and favor the moral heteronmica, clearly visible as being a relation of having and obligation.
Then, in this in case that, the way is opened for disciplines of philosophy in average education, is not due to linking with the daily one of the pupils who the contents face resistance, if something to leave wrong, we must look exits in another place. Given the initial kick in the attempt to sensetize the pupils how much to the thematic ones of it disciplines of philosophy let us pass now to one second question: to problematizar around these subjects in intention to inquire if the problems that had touched, for example, Plato in relation to the education appears for the pupils in the same way or has another connotation. What it took Plato to understand that education is not to give eyes to the blind people, but to guide or to direct of adequate form the eyes of who well enxerga. What the pupils of average education think on its proper education. He is one I benefit or a enfadonha imposition? They would by itself choose to study and if they would dedicate of good grado to this task? These questions, I think, I could be made in the target of the interpretation of the alegoria of the cave, where it is evident that one that is chained when free being of chains is obliged to look at front and to walk erect, forced to go up aclive of the cave indicating that education is to make violence to the next one. In synthetic way: to sensetize the pupil concerning the necessity of if thinking philosophical we can mention that the cited authors had thought the question of the freedom as something that all man must long for, but to problematizar appears the question of the inherent risks the freedom and to investigate it is enough to ask what it is the freedom? How it if of? Where it consists? Which are its limits? That benefits can happen of the freedom? the risks? In the case it is only is only one of the subjects here that can be boarded enter the pupils of average education.
United States Enemy
If it is not natural, it will still be a mother-child, boy or girl, and her children must come under its influence. Due to the fact that women have always ruled, humiliated her, turning her into a faceless creature, it was disgusting. They became aggressive, uncompromising, masculine. But they can be understood: oppression for centuries has made them so, and blame the man. Consider the motion of feminists. Now around the world gather activists liberation of women's movement in order to raise the level of his consciousness. But their meeting pursue only one goal: to destroy the very nature of women.
Only in this way they could compete with men. But women differ in tenderness, they are delicate by nature. If they want to compete with men, they would have to be rude. al Group. If you are faced with an activist for the rights of women, you would see that her face has become stringent features. It is hard to tell her "Babe." She gets mad, it's not like it. Why "Babe," it is the same as you. In the United States, where feminism has become the extreme form, women can sue only for the fact that the man let her go ahead. Her it supposedly offends.
She believes that man shows by this gesture of inequality that it is lower, weaker than him. Women's feminist movement creates unnecessary trouble. It turns women into wolves, it teaches them to fight. Male – an enemy, but as you can love an enemy? How can I do to have intimate relations with the enemy? Women need to know that any struggle leading to the coarsening.