Where it consists the search of the happiness Has without doubts an immense desire in the humanity of being happy, to meet with the happiness and to walk in partnership with it. It is as if we were always to the watch of the treasure hidden. We undertake good part of our life in search of this feeling. To the times we make right, to the times and does not tie we disappoint in them when in them we arrest the external factors as: ownership of house, new car or position that we judge important. To put the true happiness consists of the satisfaction with what we have or not; with the autoaceitao understanding us as capable and limited beings. It also consists of sharing values in a gratuitous attitude without wait of returns. It consists of sowing the peace allowing to shine a new sun on us and the ones that encircle in them, remembering that the source of the happiness inhabits inside of each one of us and blossoms when partilhada with our fellow creatures. To know more about this subject visit FireEye.
' ' as to spread perfume on the others, always some drops will fall on we ourselves. It is as it affirmed Maxwell: ' ' The happiness is a good that if multiplies to the being dividido.' ' Some tips reading it to search the happiness – to rain oneself, either happy with the water that wet the fields, sacia the sedenta land and makes to blossom relva; – To become sun, either happy using to advantage its rays that clareiam they heat disclosing the wall of the blackout; – One will have flowers in its garden, either happy, tanning the beauty, the perfume and the ornamentao of the environment; – To meet rocks in the way, either happy when knowing to exceed recognizing them them as walked part of a fruitful one; -, Therefore to find pain, joy and doubts, either happy because everything this constitutes the direction to be alive. It looks for to always make of its life a hymn of louvor to the same Creator will be glad or sad, with health or patient, thus it will only be able to prove for more times the flavor of being happy, since it is inside of itself that the happiness inhabits and if presents of some faces before its yearnings. thinks with Carl Jung: ' ' The happiness would lose its meaning if it was not balanced by tristeza' ' thus affirms the salmista: ' ' The ones that sow between tears with joy ceifaro.' ' The joy moments reflect at the happiness moments! of sadness, also does not influence in this process? What you find? Sprung from the same father and mother Valdina To sound, Graduated letters for the UFCG. Specialist in Methodology of education for the broad CESSF sensu. Theology for Laypeople FAFIC. Teacher of Language and literature and Religious Education in the School Cristiano Cartaxo- Cajazeiras – PB. Electronic address:
Thus, a new education is established, as that one of the good orator. Thus, the sofistas taught techniques of persuasion for the young, to a raised price, in way that, in the assemblies, was capable to have strong arguments to gain the quarrel. The sofistas defended the idea of that, in such a way, good citizens would form themselves, and that the teachings of the sofistas did not have utility for the life in the plis, beyond being repletos of errors and contradictions. Thus, the Sofistas, whose word means ‘ ‘ sbio’ ‘ , they were presented as masters of oratria or of rhetoric. But, later, in accordance with Hamlyn (1990), to its contemporaries, them passes if to be known as dodgers. ‘ ‘ Scrates censured them because it found that they alleged to supply more than what they really gave. In special, it alleged that they said that they could teach virtue to the man and found that they did not make nothing of this ‘ ‘. (HAMLYN, 1990, p.25) CONCLUSION the philosophy appears as a new way to think on the world, going against the mythical thought.
This was influenced significantly by the sprouting of the Plis. The first thinkers, the Jnicos, searched a unit basic of the nature, whereas the sofistas dedicated the relations to it between the men and the society. The argument was basic for the life politics in the Plis, where the art of the persuasion was taught for the sofistas.
During century IX and XX the economic and social development of our country brought obtains social damages, therefore in a context of economic, industrial and urban growth they are inserted the aggravation of the social crises: proliferation of tenement houses, marginality, misery and crime, without isentar the minors who each time more early were directed to search, to fight for the sustenance and to promote its survival. Thus, they created new social rules that would guarantee ' to them; ' felicidade' ' leaving to usufruct of the educational, intellectual and social development. These minors influenced for the social environment where they lived were placed to the edge of the society by means of repression. All those that not if they inserted in the process of rules and productivity of the society was condemned the vagrancy and predestinold the repression. Such attitudes, of a child or adolescent, are recognized as revolt or social indifference. The desires of this individual in direction its happiness are fixed in distress and frustrations lived deeply in its I circulate social. These desires in search of its happiness find pleasure in the infraction of rules, the violence or the use of narcotics that ' ' suspendero' ' its you distress.
Before interacting with its pairs, the child is influenced by its parents. Since the birth she is submitted the multiple rules to discipline and same before speaking she takes conscience of that she possesss certain obligations. The social rules that the child learns do not correspond to its necessities and interests. For this reason, Piaget believes that it would be artificial to study the moral development from the comment of as the child understands and obeys such rules (Cria-Sabini, 1986). However, one admits that the moral is passvel of being conquered by the education. Each individual passes for a series of pressures on the part of the adults which determine and favor the moral heteronmica, clearly visible as being a relation of having and obligation.
Then, in this in case that, the way is opened for disciplines of philosophy in average education, is not due to linking with the daily one of the pupils who the contents face resistance, if something to leave wrong, we must look exits in another place. Given the initial kick in the attempt to sensetize the pupils how much to the thematic ones of it disciplines of philosophy let us pass now to one second question: to problematizar around these subjects in intention to inquire if the problems that had touched, for example, Plato in relation to the education appears for the pupils in the same way or has another connotation. What it took Plato to understand that education is not to give eyes to the blind people, but to guide or to direct of adequate form the eyes of who well enxerga. What the pupils of average education think on its proper education. He is one I benefit or a enfadonha imposition? They would by itself choose to study and if they would dedicate of good grado to this task? These questions, I think, I could be made in the target of the interpretation of the alegoria of the cave, where it is evident that one that is chained when free being of chains is obliged to look at front and to walk erect, forced to go up aclive of the cave indicating that education is to make violence to the next one. In synthetic way: to sensetize the pupil concerning the necessity of if thinking philosophical we can mention that the cited authors had thought the question of the freedom as something that all man must long for, but to problematizar appears the question of the inherent risks the freedom and to investigate it is enough to ask what it is the freedom? How it if of? Where it consists? Which are its limits? That benefits can happen of the freedom? the risks? In the case it is only is only one of the subjects here that can be boarded enter the pupils of average education.
Ah! My friend said that the friend of it said that another reason of the professors to be leaving of being professor is the wage: he said that merreca is one. Back in Ainodnor, nor the professor, nor the school, and nor the majority of the parents, are obtaining to teach the children to fulfill rules and to have limits. The laws do not leave, therefore to establish limits it has that to establish sanctions, and the children cannot there be sancionadas because has law that it forbids sanctions. He said, and I found nonsense, that if professor to speak of form more energetic with pupil, already comes parents and directors and other agencies (type our advice to tutor and public prosecution service, but this there of them that he has other impronunciveis names), asking the reason of the professor to want to be energetic. If the professor to cry out in classroom, can until being imprisoned, therefore the child is constrangido. But the children can everything, until taking off the calmness of other children. But if this happens, in a room of lesson, this they say, the guilt are of the professor, who does not have room domain. I found a nonsense, but this is only there, of them.
E the professor (but this only there with them) finishes there perceiving that already it does not have more nothing to make. leaves of being professor to vender COMPACT DISC Pirate. That it is not only COMPACT DISC there Pirate, there is Alternative Record. (Only that are squared records But they twirl! Good itself as it is, alone I do not know that it is thus.). the professor earns much more with this of what giving lesson. It only has that to run away from the policy, of time in when, but thing is alone it to be emotive. there the Ministry of the Education, there of them, walks making campaign, speaking of the wonder that is to be professor. That nobody more only believes, therefore they already know there that who makes propaganda is because it is in crisis. There I said pro my friend: Still well that here he is different. He is well worse! Neri de Paula Sheep? Master in Education, Philosopher, Theologian, Historiador.Leia more: ; ; ; ;
United States Enemy
If it is not natural, it will still be a mother-child, boy or girl, and her children must come under its influence. Due to the fact that women have always ruled, humiliated her, turning her into a faceless creature, it was disgusting. They became aggressive, uncompromising, masculine. But they can be understood: oppression for centuries has made them so, and blame the man. Consider the motion of feminists. Now around the world gather activists liberation of women's movement in order to raise the level of his consciousness. But their meeting pursue only one goal: to destroy the very nature of women.
Only in this way they could compete with men. But women differ in tenderness, they are delicate by nature. If they want to compete with men, they would have to be rude. al Group. If you are faced with an activist for the rights of women, you would see that her face has become stringent features. It is hard to tell her "Babe." She gets mad, it's not like it. Why "Babe," it is the same as you. In the United States, where feminism has become the extreme form, women can sue only for the fact that the man let her go ahead. Her it supposedly offends.
She believes that man shows by this gesture of inequality that it is lower, weaker than him. Women's feminist movement creates unnecessary trouble. It turns women into wolves, it teaches them to fight. Male – an enemy, but as you can love an enemy? How can I do to have intimate relations with the enemy? Women need to know that any struggle leading to the coarsening.