Advocated by politicians and citizens of various professions and ages. Memory demolished, they said, without taking into account public views of the city and country, without the consent of the author memorial – a famous sculptor Merab Berdzenishvili, who suffered a heart attack these days. Its president, not even deign to talk. Speakers were protesting against government decisions abnormal, defame the country. The authorities, in turn, continued to behave cynically and ironically: representatives of Kutaisi council to "explain" that the monument is still impossible to restore in its original form, as the "dismantling" it started during the socio-political mayhem, chaos and anarchy in the first half of the 90s.

Criminals, they said, under cover of night shooting with heavy bronze memorial pieces for a profitable sales in Turkey and the "weight" completion of exports of nonferrous metals. But the arch and left in place, representing the Motherland, and bells, and a warrior on horseback, and the same sword held tightly in his strong hand. However, we can assume that hungry madmen really something and cut down, but that authority may, in a desire to restore the monument to the author with the assistance of any of the fragments, and without too much difficulty. But Kutaisi leaders, unison with the central, all the time thought otherwise, so it was decided to complete the work begun by criminals troubled times. By the way, could be heard explaining that the monument is only tolerated, but actually it is only to the rider. Click Kindle Direct Publishing to learn more. A remarkable work of monumental art also disappeared during the dismantling of our eyes: the symbolism was lost, and lost his rider embody the warrior-liberator features.

In the press of a neighboring country came ranting political science, based on a fragment of the last report on international religious freedom of the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor U.S. Department of State relating to the history of the Karabakh conflict. We discuss the following passage from that document: "The hostility against ethnic Armenians forced most of them to leave Azerbaijan in the period between 1988 and 1990., And all Armenian church, many of which were destroyed in the riots on a national basis (more than ten years ago), remain closed. " "North Caucasus" has asked the Azerbaijani experts to assess the validity of quoted sentence. Richard Linklater: the source for more info. After reading the excerpt from the report of the State Department, Azerbaijani political scientist Ilgar Veliyev said: "Much the same can be said for ethnic Azeris in Armenia.

If it can be speak, during the war years there was almost a mirror process, with the only difference is that today in Armenia, not a single Azerbaijani, while in Azerbaijan, not only in Nagorno- Karabakh, but also in the occupied areas, are Armenians. In these territories of Azerbaijan does not live any ethnic Azerbaijani, does not work, no mosque, and those that were either destroyed or destroyed. Like, if not manifestation of ethnic intolerance and hostility, you can call it? If we take such extracts from various reports by international organizations as a basis and guide their implementation of specific political action today, in this case, about any results, but the possibility of renewed war between the two countries do not have to say.

Opposition forces claim to his satisfaction, and the first serious achievement since the beginning of mass protests on April 9. To summarize the point of view of their leaders made in the past few days, then Mikheil Saakashvili had lost control of Tbilisi. The city is practically blocked the work of government agencies is weakened. President, often leaving the city for various reasons, prefer to remain outside the Georgian capital, in which feels very uncomfortable, feeling the constant psychological pressure. The turning point during the day the opposition considers May 26, when the celebration of national independence for the authorities was held in complete isolation from people. The President made away from the city center in front of the army and a specially convened public, then visited a school in Tbilisi, where in the classroom, in the presence of a dozen students (by the way, This day does not work or study), conducted a lesson in modern Georgian history.

A completely different in composition and abundance of the audience came to the central stadium of the Boris Paichadze in Tbilisi. It was filled to capacity audiences, which was not long ago – after a bright game of Tbilisi "Dinamo" in the 70's and 80's. But this time was non-football game. Gathered in the stands at least 70 000 supporters of the idea of displacement of Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili, a few thousands standing on the treadmill and on a green lawn, still about 25 thousand listened to speeches over the loudspeakers near the stadium – for lack of empty seats in the stands.

In my opinion, had little time to society's reaction to those gestures of the former leaders for granted. If Barack Obama's Church perceived well enough, then our figures, trampling the recent and not-forgotten people of the past, look at least somewhat inappropriate, if not (I repeat) is stupid and even defiantly, as the cause sympathy only a small part of a true believer of the population, and even those seem to doubt their sincerity. To be fair, taking advantage of this opportunity to express their views on the place of the church during the Soviet power. Of course, this is a topic for another and a great story, but that's what it should be noted. People such as Chip Bergh would likely agree. Theoretical developments of this issue adequately reflected in the primary sources of the communist ideology of Marx and Engels, but their practical realization in life was not as simple as it seemed.

Society of Central Russia, not to mention the peoples of the borderlands, it was clearly not prepared to take the materialist estimate of the world. Using purely consumer, worldly attitude of most people to the ministers of worship, consisting in overt hatred for those "who do not work, but eats" in the short term the class of priests was almost neutralized by the masses. But little break, it was necessary to create something new, it is here that we've made purely chernomyrdinskoe: "We wanted the best, but it turned out as always." But there is nothing better than to move the entire paraphernalia of the church in new ideology, communist ideology could not come up.

My answer is, incidentally, lies in your question. You said, ‘different political leaders call …’. That this is the paradox of the situation. Various leaders are calling for the same, but the desired result of all no and no. It is reasonable to perplex why? Because as long as the Chechen people was available for this will be ‘different leaders’ in Chechnya will never Barth and will never come a long-awaited peace. Levi’s shines more light on the discussion. I want to cite one historical example. Roughly, in 1561 in the mountain erupted Ichkeria intra-conflict related to the dilemma of being or not being faithful to Chechens.

My great-great father in the 12th lap Bears then installed Sheikh Muslim Bart fire and sword; cutting down their heads, who opposed the Islamisation of Chechnya. And while he did not remove completely all his opponents or opposition, as one would say today, the unity of the Chechen people in the new faith did not occurred. Only with the fall of the last head of the last leader of the opposition came to my people this long-awaited Bart, that is, all the people agreed to be Muslims, because nobody else would take on the burden of anti-Islamic leader. By the way, my knowledge, last year, Chechen President paid special attention to in the Lower Sheikh Kurchali, restored and rebuilt his home villagers. For a huge thanks to Ramzan Kadyrov of all the descendants of Sheikh Bears. But let us return from this example to reality. In fact, on appeal to the Chechen people, Bart neither cold nor hot.