The university was given the opportunity to know almost everything that is at least how something can be rational, "attributed" to the profession or as a student of human beings in general. For example, we historians have studied anthropology, psychology, logic, life safety, and medicine (the latter – after a tick in the list – at the undergraduate, and not when, it appears that they have to go as well as all general subjects). Go to the same primary and bottomless subject – the history, selected as the paths of learning, it turned out to be was secondary. And it is true to some extent: self plays a crucial role, but that's a minimal basis, immortalized in the educational programs was too shallow and slippery, and slips on ignorance of the elementary had often. The strength of knowledge depends largely on the willingness of the student, then really, who studied both. But unwittingly come up the faces of those teachers that left not only his full face and profile, but phrases, snatches of sentences, phrases, words, ideas and reinterpret digested opinion. Others were only a profile and full face.

It remains only to what he had read, heard, wrote, think of it. "Bison versus nezubry plus free- Many teachers are satisfied, "cramming" method (or strategy?), With whom the post-Soviet education, as seen, is gradually beginning neupornuyu struggle. But too many remain invulnerable teachers, eager to retelling of the student sections of textbooks and forth in the paragraphs of summaries, apparently, to secure their own teaching knowledge. The result justifies the effort involved in scanning the material, that's only strength to be a medieval slate marked "write-erase" (the surface which, after filling it with symbols, trimmed to start writing again), right, run out for release. There are powerless at the exit Students from the University of much. Promotion or at least neotritsaniem "bison" sin, our university strong.