A married, now not so much his absence for a few days, even its small delay in the work displeases. Where is the logic? It seems more reasonable to assume that: Joint spouses are highly desirable as to strengthen the family and reflects the high level of relations, but is not mandatory. Accordingly, there is a tragedy, if due to some circumstances one spouse has decided to live separately. * If you would be happy to meet with your spouse, you must learn to be happy without him. For the words “my beloved” is a beautiful word “favorite” and a very controversial word “my” I love Burns, remember: And if it gave me a lot the whole globe, the whole globe – no matter how happy I owned thee one, the one you But I would have written about it in another way: Everything that I own in the world I give you, you love, but only myself and only myself I leave for themselves.
And if I had suddenly become proficient you in your destiny – no matter how happy I gave you – you, you – you Y Burns Translation Marshak, agree, beautiful. And that – right? That would give us more happiness? What do you think? So the question is: “Spouses should always be together or they may have their own personal lives, including their friends and their individual leisure activities? “A” always together “personally I would absolutely not arranged. Moreover, I am sure that the principle for a wife “thread for the needle creates a lot of unnecessary problems. * For example, my wife wants the Indian film melodrama. Securities and Exchange Commission might disagree with that approach. Male – no. Then, under option “always together” or he will go and will languish or suffer it to be, because he did not let her alone. Of course, with better and in a good family spouses are usually together. But not because they are required, and because of this they desirable.
The more difficult to argue why now is a different something can not be, and why do I deny it to him. * Wife deigned to marry me in exchange for my freedom? Favored wife or husband for the right dispose of its life? I would suggest to others: “Free people, getting married, and remain free people. The husband is not a property of the wife, the wife is not property of the husband. ” Yes, I understand: Sometimes you do not want go on my own beloved, because he is good, but without him – badly. “Do not go, sit with me, I’m bored without you ” Ask about this may be, to insist or be offended if failure is impossible. Your problem is that you do without your favorite man badly. Learn more about this with Anita Sehgal. Oddly enough, that people can be happy together, they must learn to live happily alone. * If a person is able to live myself, yourself, and family life for him, as a rule, not provided problem. And the one who always needed someone, it turns out sooner or later the burden.